sti4lifer (September 5, 2008 at 5:31 am)

thats pretty savage hell u could possibly make ur own hydrogen for free!

ShiroSenda (August 27, 2008 at 12:27 am)

I agree with you about half the thing you say. The term "Water power" is vague. Tidal power or hydro power is probably more accurant. Anyways, Hydro power and biogas is renewable, but we could never manufacture enough supply the world. Solar power is widely available, but require a significant investment and the sun don't always shine. What we need is to break up water where that sun does sun, and move the H2 and O2 to where it doens't. Damn, I am out of room to type.

ionutgasgas (August 25, 2008 at 5:38 am)

I need one now !!!!!

DROIDFARM (August 21, 2008 at 6:03 am)

COOL

Swrtzjstn12 (August 20, 2008 at 4:59 am)

yes

Ta0425 (August 20, 2008 at 1:21 am)

Modern, large electrolysis plants have an effectivity of over 80%, so you do not need twice as much energy, but you are right that producing the amounts of hydrogen needed for individual traffic using fossil fuels and nuclear power would not be any better for the environment than just letting people continue driving their gasoline cars. The energy would have to be provided from renewable sources like waterpower, photovoltaics, biogas, wind etc. which would be possible, just not so soon.

UberWagen (August 19, 2008 at 9:25 pm)

Not entirely..There's a guy making it in his backyard in New Jersey running an electrolyzer off of solar power. So he pretty much drives for free.

wootizzle1 (August 17, 2008 at 4:31 pm)

I agree, but if you look at all the other alternative fuels, it ranks pretty far up there. Plus its pretty dang cool.

Xonviver (August 17, 2008 at 11:53 am)

Is it possible to upload your own youtube movie longer than 10 minutes long?

pasukngpasuk (August 17, 2008 at 2:43 am)

That car might only good 4 theoretical purposes but it cannot be used in practical application. hydrogen is harder and more expenssive to produce compare to petrol products.